Friday, September 30, 2011

A Greek Coin has a depiction of 'geometic algebra'

I'm affraid this is my best proof right now.  Even the link doesn't show it; but, it does show a statement to the effect.  I've shown Minoan coins showing mazes; now Greek coins showing 'Geometric Algebra.'  And, of course, there's lots of coins of Roman emperors; there's coins of Jewish interest as well.  But, there's no coins of Jesus Christ!

I've finalty found an internet picture of the coin!  So, I've taken down the link above!

Here's a Jerusalem coin of like 400 B.C. of Yehwey.  Who says the Jews didn't make art of concepts and historical events they thought were big?  And if so, why didn't they make any Jesus Christ coins?

- This is a Jewish coin 55 B.C. "In about 55 BC the Roman moneyer Aulus Plautius issued a denarius with a peculiar reference to Judaism in its reverse inscription. Its obverse bears a turreted head of Cybele, probably a reference to the Megalesian games, sponsored by Rome's curule aediles, a title Plautius included on his coin. The reverse shows a man kneeling aside a camel, extending an olive branch to a Roman soldier. The legend inscribed on the reverse, of which 150 different die types are known, is "BACCHIVS IVDAEUS" (Bacchius Judaeus)." 

This is proof of mixing Judaism with Greek sungod religion(see my Gospel of Truth about sungods and Jesus Christ). It's also of course further evidence that if Jesus Christ had actually existed, they would have made coins of him.  But, there aren't any . . .

astro picture for the day

NASA Hubble space telescope

Thursday, September 29, 2011

astro picture for the day

NASA Galileo spacecraft image of Ganymede.

Ganymede isn't as famous as Europa and Io, the other "Galilean" moons of Jupiter; but, this image shows it in fine form!

The Galileo spacecraft unfortunatelly had a main radio antenna fault on the way to Jupiter and it's scientific production was drastically reduced.  This image amongst others shows what could have been! 

Related, there was a Juno spacecraft sent to Jupiter just recently(like maybe a month ago), to make up a little bit for that lost spacecraft(one of most beautifull space probes ever by the way!  Most are quite spartan in appearance!  ).

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

thought for the day/ Stuart Kauffman's "Reinventing the Sacred."

I didn't read the whole book. I skipped the economics, quantum brains(not that I object to the idea; in fact, quantum entanglement in biology has been proven recently in bees and flowers; surelly, there must be some quantum entanglement going on in the nervous system and biological brains including humans), and the remaining mixing up of various religion and science. I of course prefer Jacob Bronowski's understanding of how religion relates to science; mathematical science is an abstraction; abstraction is analogy; religion is mythology; mythology is poetry; poetry is analogy - metaphor/simile.  Only mathematical science is constructive; poetry is about being vague - just read the bible!

Stuart Kauffman presents some great scientific problems about entropy and the arrow of time.  He also has some interesting ideas about energy in living systems; but, I'm not posting this to review those things; most of that can be found in his "At Home in the Universe."(I recommend that one!)  I'm writing this to argue against some of his new philosophy of science.

I'm not objecting to his points about "mathematical science can't predict everything."  I for one didn't grow up with scientists argueing that we can predict everything.  The unified field theorists of the twentieth century didn't argue that was vary practical.  Mathematicians knew and went through the psychology of "Godel's theorems" since 1931.  He mentions the Godel's theorems but seems to bring it up as if it were new!  I for one have found it striking that scientists have not considered Godel's theorems to be relevant to the real world(even though with a few generalizations, they're the theoretical basis for computers).  Maybe it needs to be brought up.

Stuart wants to argue that because we can't predict everything, therefore, reinvent the sacred; combine religion with science; vagueness with constructive mathematical science. I'm argueing that we should accept our finiteness; we should accept our ignorance.  People are always saying that because science didn't solve 'all' their problems overnight, therefore it's wrong and we should embrace some supernatural religion.  It's a play on ignorance.  As I've said, god is the algebraic X standing for 'I don't know.'  God did it to everything good and bad; if bad, "God works in mysterious ways."

Stuart Kauffman further argues for emergent phenomenon; i for one have kind of argued that new mathemtical concepts are emergent(see my second article on this blog).  Stuart is saying no axiomatic system can predict everything; but, is this the point of science?  Does science not go out, collect data, then organise into some pattern; look at the pattern to see what it can possibly predict and then go and see if those predictions work?  One can say the same thing about mathematical proof; first, you need to find a pattern, a generalization, to conjecture; then you try to fit it in the axioms(you also get to select your axioms).  So, it's not so much that we just come up with theory out of thin air and then predict.  I find this mistake amongst leading thinkers today like Eric Drexler who was too quick to disregard unified field theories and embrace the new info theoretic everything is bits theory of everything(this info theoretic entropy idea of gravity has recently been disproved by some neutron balancing act with gravity experiments).  The point that is missed is that even if you have different theories for everything, how do they relate?  This is what theorists try to do; they're trying to relate everything in the universe because the universe is one whole; they must all relate!  My bringing up about the latest info-theoretic craze amongst our greatest intellectuals brings me to Stuarts other major problem with contemporary science - reductionism.

Stuart's fight against Reductionism reminds me of the Creationists fight against natural selection and Newtonian mechanics; they're centuries behind!  Stuart Kauffman should see at least the biological side of my point here; he's one of the main leaders in the dynamical systems understanding of life from the nineteen hundreds!  I'm talking about chaos theory, Ilya Prigogine's "Stable non-equilibrium thermodynamics", and Stuart Kauffmans' auto-catalytic sets(others ideas/words like Autopoiesis is essentially the same thing). Creationists everywhere are fighting about past concepts while the science has advanced far beyond!  The same thing can be said about the anti-science groups who argue against Newtonian mechanics; science has advanced well beyond it! Quantum mechanics, Special and General Relativity, chaos theory . . . ;

There's something more to be said about the silliness of argueing about Reductionism.  Stuart Kauffman makes the fight against Reductionism as if bringing down Reductionism is going to bring down mathematical science and put mathematics in its place.  That's like argueing against Ptolemaic epicycles and declaring God as the concept we all need to embrace from now on. Like the way the ancient Greeks made their Earth centered cosmology(ultimately grew into Ptolemy's epicycles theory; the theory really goes back to Eudoxes who was 'saving the appearances' of Plato; the appearances is that of the planets retrograding back and forth; why do they do that and the other stars don't?  Not meaning to suggest that the planets are the same as the stars) because if you take the world at face value on what your senses are telling you, you'd naturally argue that the planets and stars, and the sun go around the earth, and the Earth is this rock that just sits there.  Reductionism is much like this.  When Newton came up with his mechanics, he then considered the possibility that you could describe the whole universe as billiard balls.  Maybe Newton went on to try to describe philosophically science as trying to picture everything as billiard balls; but, scientists soon did.  This is indeed a mistake.  Mathematical Science did not arise by reductionism, but by means of abstractions; unifications of similar forms; constructive ones at that.  It arose from questioning assumptions like the assumption of the earth centered universe which ultimately led the Copernican solar centered solar system. Similarly, idealization helped see behind appearances of 'natural state of motion.' When Galileo(and others before him) realized friction was causing things to stop, we soon(through experiment/observation) realized that different masses fall at the same rate in a vacuum.  I don't know what's more spiritual than that!

We shouldn't try to mix rational with the irrational to make a static final answer to everything; we should embrace our ignorance; we need to get used to the fact that we need to learn, constantly in order to survive. 
ESO image above
Credit & Copyright: Jason Jennings

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

astro picture of the day

Credit & Copyright: Rogelio Bernal Andreo

Still the most detailed wide angled astro picture of the Orion nebula region(including the horsehead nebula)

Monday, September 26, 2011

astro picture for the day

NASA Hubble space telescope

This is the crab nebula; a supernova remnant;

Sunday, September 25, 2011

astro picture for the day

Credit & Copyright: Rogelio Bernal Andreo

Believe it or not, but the left blue nebulae with stars is the Pleides(the second Pleides I've put up farely recently).  There's lots more of these great pictures coming up too!

Saturday, September 24, 2011

astro picture of the day

Credit: NASA, ESA

This is the region around our galactic center; the Claw on the left are magnetic fields light years in dimension caused by the interaction of our galaxies black hole with . . . everything stars, intersteller dust and gas!

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

NASA Cassini spacecraft images or Saturnian moon Encaladius

Sunday, September 11, 2011

astro picture for the day

NASA Hubble space telescope.  this picutre is of a Planetary Nebula like the ring nebula or many planetary nebula already shown.

Friday, September 9, 2011

astro picture for the day

NASA Mars Express

This is an orbiting asteroid "Phobos" of mars.  It will crash into Mars at some distant future.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

astro picture for the day

Image Credit & Copyright: Sergio Eguivar

An open star cluster well after burning away the gas cloud star factory womb.  There's lots of these if you just take a pair of binoculars to the milky way.  The Big Dipper constellation is the only real star constellation where the majority of the stars really came from the same star factory gas cloud.  As these star clusters go about the milky way galaxy, they get dispersed. It's interesting to see the various star clusters seeable through a pair of binoculars at different stages of getting absorbed into the general motions of our galaxy.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

youtube for the day/ first nano molecular motor

Already they're talking about meshing them to make nano-mechanical devices. “The next thing to do is to get the thing to do work that we can measure – to couple it to other molecules, lining them up next to one another so they’re like miniature cog-wheels, and then watch the rotation propagation down the chain,” - Dr Sykes

This doesn't seem like much progress considering Eric Drexler has been trying to work on the theoretical aspects and get others to do the experimental aspects for like thirty plus years; but, this is just one recent development; there's a wealth of stm developments and other nanotechnologies that can 'mesh' with this.  Still, it will be interesting to see how quickly these guys and others use this with all kinds of other nanotechnologies like graphene, dna-nanotech and so on.

I just noticed something peculiar . . . the date of this video's upload . . . Aug 17, 2010. 

astro picture for the day

ESA Planck satellite image of our galactic center region in infrared.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

astro picture for the day

NASA Casinni spacecraft.

Word out is this is a real picture of Saturn eclipsing the sun.  It's revealed some new rings never before seen.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Major Breaking News! Quantum computers realized

Yep, that's right, the world is going through revolutionary changes, and . . . the major news outlets said a thing about it.  Not sure what else to say about that.

Here's a couple of links.

These were announced a couple of days ago; i've been too tired to post anything much.  Maybe I was waiting for the major news channels to announce these things. 

There hasn't been much nanotech news - not even graphene news.  There was the use of dna-nanotech to make large scale cloaking devices though!  I mean all kinds of things like artificial evolution of proteins to make different mechanical components were announced I don't know how many months ago; there hasn't been any followup; either, they're extremelly busy and having lots of fun experimenting with these things and making nano-manufacturing(although primitive pre-Drexlerian daimondoid nano-manufacturing) happen; or, they've hit a problem and are douting themselves whether they can make anything with dna-nanotech and protein nano-mechanical parts.  But!  The Quantum computing advances linked above should really help!

astro picture for the day

Hubble space telescope; you can see the star factory being eaten away from the new stars inside.

Friday, September 2, 2011